Legal Malpractice and Professional Liability
Professionals such as lawyers, CPAs, engineers, architects, and surveyors have a duty to act reasonably according the standards of practice in their respective fields. Our firm has handled many multi-million dollar claims against professionals and defended many as well. Very few firms have handled professional liability claims on both sides of the docket. Wynne & Wynne certainly has. Burdine Wynne lawyers have a unique understanding of how both sides think and will work hard to leverage every aspect of a professional liability claim to the client’s advantage whether a plaintiff or defendant. David Wynne recently and successfully prosecuted a significant legal malpractice claim against two law firms that spoliated critical evidence. The firm also, though, recently and successfully defended a well-respected law firm against a groundless malpractice claim. We are well versed in the most recent state and federal law regarding the proper elements of a malpractice claim or defense.
Not every mistaken tactical decision or legal opinion constitutes negligence, much less breach of fiduciary duty, but if a law firm or lawyer has failed to act in accordance with legal industry rules, customs, and practices, perhaps including the heightened standards applicable to an attorney who is board-certified, a viable claim for legal malpractice may exist. Malpractice claims sometimes result from missing deadlines, failing to properly investigate claims, omitting claims or defenses, mishandling client funds, or failing to adequately communicate with clients. Burdine Wynne has experience handling all aspects of significant, complex legal malpractice claims.
Some of the legal malpractice cases successfully handled by lawyers at the firm include:
- 1. Cause No. 2009-73292; Jorge Gonzalez vs. [Lawyers and law firm]; In the 190th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas Represented Plaintiff on multi-million dollar claims of alleged legal malpractice for Defendants alleged failure to identify and timely pursue products liability claims arising out of an automobile collision involving a vehicle rollover. Confidential settlements reached in part through mediation. Defendants counsel were, respectively, Cruse, Scott, Henderson & Allen, LLP and Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP.
- 1. Cause No. 2010-02015; Lucy Lee Hale and Carey Keene West III, Trustee vs. Merrill Lynch Trust Company of Texas, ML Life Agency, Inc. and Richard Wuensch; in the 55th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas Represented Plaintiffs on multi-million dollar claims against the Merrill Lynch defendants arising out of estate planning advice and related trust and insurance structuring and against lawyer and law firm on claims of legal malpractice. Confidential settlement reached in mediation. Merrill Lynch Defendants were represented by Hunton & Williams LLP. Lawyer defendants were represented by Henslee Schwartz, LLP.
- Represented a major Houston law firm in eight separate cases brought in the aggregate by several hundred investors in a group of entities that the Houston law firm had represented. The claims exceeded $100 million. The firm successfully moved to consolidate several of the cases administratively and then removed all the cases to federal court where a settlement was achieved without cost to the clients. The firm also represented the law firm in a related declaratory judgment action by which its insurer sought to avoid coverage.
Other professional liability suits the firm has handled includes claims against engineers, accountants, financial advisors, land surveyors, and oil and gas operators.
Our law firm is currently representing class representatives in a class action lawsuit regarding widespread barratry violations involving Texas Law Shield, a firearms legal defense program. Plaintiffs allege that Texas Law Shield and its owners/lawyers have violated Texas barratry statutes by soliciting prospective clients in person, paying others to solicit prospective clients (including salaries to salesman and kickbacks to CHL instructors), permitting solicitations at CHL classes that includes undue influence over class attendees, and collecting substantial fees as a result of the solicitations at CHL classes and other firearms classes. The Texas barratry statute, Texas Government Code §82.0651, entitles people who have been wrongfully solicited to recover damages and statutory penalties even if they did not sign up or pay any fees. If you have been solicited to sign up for Texas Law Shield’s firearm legal defense program during a CHL class or other firearms class, please contact our firm. You may be entitled to monetary relief.